Publishing Knowledge. Connecting Professionals. Advancing Pathology.

Case Categories

Over 800 peer-reviewed clinical pathology cases spanning all major subspecialties, curated by an international editorial board and updated weekly.

Case of the Month

Each month our editorial board selects a single case of exceptional educational value. The case is presented in full diagnostic format with expert commentary, teaching points and references for continuing professional development.

Case Library

Explore our curated collection of clinical pathology cases spanning all major subspecialties. Each case includes high-resolution images, IHC panels, expert discussion and referenced teaching points.

Showing 12 of 847 cases

Breast PathologyExpertH&E · 40× · Case #GPP-2026-0412
Breast Pathology · Case #GPP-2026-0412

Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma with Unexpected Molecular Profile

A 47-year-old female presented with a 3.2 cm palpable mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast. Core needle biopsy revealed a high-grade invasive carcinoma that was negative for ER, PR and HER2 by immunohistochemistry. However, comprehensive genomic profiling using a 500-gene next-generation sequencing panel identified an unexpected NTRK3 fusion and high tumour mutational burden (TMB-H), prompting reconsideration of therapeutic strategy and enrolment in a basket trial with larotrectinib.

Prof. Sunil R. Lakhani · Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital
BreastMolecularExpert
GI PathologyIntermediateH&E · 20× · Case #GPP-2026-0389
GI Pathology · Case #GPP-2026-0389

Challenging Duodenal Biopsy — Coeliac Disease vs Tropical Sprue

A 31-year-old male from southern India presented with chronic diarrhoea, weight loss and megaloblastic anaemia. Duodenal biopsies demonstrated subtotal villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia and a mixed intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltrate. The distinction between coeliac disease and tropical sprue required careful clinical-pathological correlation, serology for tissue transglutaminase antibodies, HLA-DQ2/DQ8 typing and response to empirical antibiotic therapy.

Dr. Priya Ramachandran · Christian Medical College, Vellore
GISmall BowelIntermediate
HaematopathologyExpertBone Marrow Trephine · H&E · Case #GPP-2026-0401
Haematopathology · Case #GPP-2026-0401

Bone Marrow Biopsy in Unexplained Pancytopenia — Hairy Cell Leukaemia Variant

A 62-year-old male presented with unexplained pancytopenia and massive splenomegaly without lymphadenopathy. Peripheral blood showed circulating lymphoid cells with villous projections but lacking the classic cytological features of hairy cell leukaemia. Bone marrow trephine biopsy revealed an interstitial and subtle sinusoidal infiltrate of medium-sized lymphoid cells. Flow cytometry demonstrated an unusual immunophenotype: CD19+, CD20+ (bright), CD11c+, CD103−, CD25−, CD123−, annexin A1−. BRAF V600E mutation testing was negative. The case illustrates the diagnostic challenges of hairy cell leukaemia variant (HCL-v), an entity with distinct biology and therapeutic implications compared to classical HCL.

Prof. Estella Matutes · The Royal Marsden, London
HaematopathologyFlow CytometryExpert
DermatopathologyExpertH&E · 10× · Case #GPP-2026-0378
Dermatopathology · Case #GPP-2026-0378

Amelanotic Nodule on the Forearm — Spitzoid Melanoma vs Atypical Spitz Tumour

A 19-year-old female presented with a rapidly growing, 1.1 cm amelanotic nodule on the left forearm, clinically suspected to be a pyogenic granuloma. Excision biopsy revealed a dome-shaped, asymmetric melanocytic proliferation with Kamino bodies, scattered mitoses including deep dermal mitotic figures, and focal pagetoid spread. The case illustrates the diagnostic challenges at the benign-malignant interface of Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms, including the role of FISH, CGH and the recently developed MELTUMP prognostic algorithm. Sentinel lymph node biopsy findings and their uncertain prognostic significance in Spitzoid lesions are also discussed.

Dr. Klaus Busam · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
DermatopathologyMelanocyticExpert
NeuropathologyIntermediateH&E · 20× · Case #GPP-2026-0356
Neuropathology · Case #GPP-2026-0356

Posterior Fossa Mass in a 7-Year-Old

A 7-year-old boy presented with a four-week history of progressive headaches, vomiting and ataxia. MRI demonstrated a heterogeneously enhancing posterior fossa mass arising from the roof of the fourth ventricle with associated obstructive hydrocephalus. Intraoperative squash preparations and subsequent histological examination revealed a highly cellular embryonal neoplasm with nodular and internodular architecture. Methylation profiling classified the tumour as medulloblastoma, SHH-activated (TP53-wildtype), with important prognostic and therapeutic implications. The case discusses the current integrated molecular classification of medulloblastoma per the WHO CNS5 framework.

Prof. David Ellison · St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis
NeuropathologyPaediatricIntermediate
CytopathologyExpertPapanicolaou Stain · 40× · Case #GPP-2026-0334
Cytopathology · Case #GPP-2026-0334

Atypical Cells in Pleural Fluid — Mesothelioma vs Adenocarcinoma

A 68-year-old male with a 30-year history of occupational asbestos exposure presented with progressive dyspnoea and a large right-sided pleural effusion. Cytological examination of the pleural fluid revealed a population of atypical mesothelial-like cells forming papillary clusters and acinar structures. The differential between epithelioid malignant mesothelioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma required an extensive cell block immunohistochemistry panel (calretinin, WT1, D2-40, CK5/6, BerEP4, MOC-31, TTF-1, claudin-4, BAP1 loss) and FISH for CDKN2A (p16) homozygous deletion. The importance of BAP1 loss by immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic adjunct for distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelial proliferations is emphasised.

Dr. Andrew Churg · University of British Columbia, Vancouver
CytopathologyPleuralExpert
Renal PathologyIntermediatePAS Stain · 40× · Case #GPP-2026-0321
Renal Pathology · Case #GPP-2026-0321

Crescentic Glomerulonephritis — ANCA-Associated vs Anti-GBM

A 55-year-old female presented with rapidly progressive renal failure (creatinine rising from 95 to 612 µmol/L over three weeks), haematuria and proteinuria. Renal biopsy demonstrated severe crescentic glomerulonephritis affecting 18 of 22 glomeruli, with both cellular and fibrocellular crescents. Immunofluorescence showed pauci-immune pattern (no significant immunoglobulin or complement deposition). Serological testing revealed MPO-ANCA positivity at high titre with negative anti-GBM antibodies. The case discusses the differential diagnosis of crescentic GN, the importance of the ANCA serotype in predicting clinical phenotype and the current evidence for plasma exchange in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis based on the PEXIVAS trial results.

Prof. Sanjeev Sethi · Mayo Clinic, Rochester
RenalGlomerularIntermediate
Molecular PathologyExpertNGS Report · cfDNA Analysis · Case #GPP-2026-0298
Molecular Pathology · Case #GPP-2026-0298

EGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma with Resistance Mutation on Liquid Biopsy

A 58-year-old non-smoking female with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harbouring an EGFR exon 19 deletion (p.E746_A750del) developed disease progression after 14 months on first-line osimertinib. Tissue re-biopsy was technically challenging due to the location of the progressing lesion. Liquid biopsy (plasma cell-free DNA analysis) using a validated 74-gene panel identified the original EGFR exon 19 deletion alongside a novel EGFR C797S mutation in the cis configuration with the T790M resistance mutation, as well as MET amplification detected by copy number analysis. The case discusses mechanisms of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs, the role of liquid biopsy in monitoring treatment response and resistance, and emerging therapeutic strategies for C797S-mediated resistance including fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors currently in clinical trials.

Dr. Natasha Leighl · Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto
MolecularLiquid BiopsyExpert
Forensic PathologyIntermediateAutopsy Case · Case #GPP-2026-0275
Forensic Pathology · Case #GPP-2026-0275

Sudden Death in a Young Athlete — Autopsy Findings

A 22-year-old male professional football player collapsed during training and could not be resuscitated despite immediate on-field cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation. Autopsy revealed a grossly enlarged heart (weight 485 g) with asymmetric septal hypertrophy. Histological examination demonstrated extensive myocyte disarray exceeding 20% of the septum, with interstitial and replacement fibrosis in a patchy distribution. Genetic testing on post-mortem blood identified a pathogenic variant in the MYH7 gene (c.1208G>A, p.R403Q). The case discusses the pathological features and molecular genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the role of the forensic pathologist in sudden cardiac death investigation, the importance of molecular autopsy and the implications for cascade genetic screening of surviving family members.

Prof. Mary Sheppard · St George’s, University of London
ForensicCardiacIntermediate
HepatopathologyIntermediateH&E · 20× · Case #GPP-2026-0261
Hepatopathology · Case #GPP-2026-0261

Granulomatous Hepatitis — Infectious vs Drug-Induced

A 45-year-old female on long-term anti-TNF therapy (adalimumab) for rheumatoid arthritis presented with persistently elevated liver enzymes (ALT 156 U/L, ALP 312 U/L, GGT 245 U/L) and low-grade pyrexia. Liver biopsy revealed well-formed, non-caseating epithelioid granulomas distributed predominantly in a portal and periportal pattern, with focal fibrin-ring granulomas and mild interface hepatitis. Special stains for acid-fast bacilli (Ziehl-Neelsen) and fungi (GMS, PAS) were negative, and PCR for Mycobacterium tuberculosis was negative on tissue. The case discusses the broad differential diagnosis of granulomatous hepatitis, the specific risk of granulomatous infections in immunosuppressed patients, the morphological features that help distinguish infectious from drug-induced aetiologies and the clinical decision-making regarding medication withdrawal.

Dr. Eve Roberts · The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto
LiverGranulomatousIntermediate
Gynaecological PathologyTraineeH&E · 10× · Case #GPP-2026-0248
Gynaecological Pathology · Case #GPP-2026-0248

Endometrial Biopsy in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding — Hyperplasia, Atypia and the EIN Classification

A 48-year-old perimenopausal female with BMI 38 presented with heavy irregular menstrual bleeding unresponsive to medical management. Endometrial pipelle biopsy demonstrated architecturally crowded, cytologically altered glands exceeding 50% of the sampled area with loss of PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry. This teaching case reviews the evolution from the WHO94 hyperplasia classification to the current WHO/EIN (endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia) system, the diagnostic criteria for atypical endometrial hyperplasia / EIN, the role of PTEN, PAX2 and mismatch repair immunohistochemistry, and the clinical management pathway including the indications for hysterectomy versus conservative hormonal management.

Dr. Marisa Nucci · Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston
GynaecologicalEndometrialTrainee
Pulmonary PathologyTraineeH&E · 4× · Case #GPP-2026-0235
Pulmonary Pathology · Case #GPP-2026-0235

Organising Pneumonia Pattern on Lung Biopsy — Cryptogenic vs Secondary Causes

A 56-year-old female presented with persistent cough, low-grade fever and bilateral patchy consolidation on chest CT that migrated over serial imaging. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy demonstrated the classic histological pattern of organising pneumonia with Masson bodies (intraluminal plugs of granulation tissue) within alveolar ducts and alveoli, with preservation of the underlying lung architecture. This trainee-level case provides a systematic approach to the differential diagnosis of the organising pneumonia pattern, distinguishing cryptogenic organising pneumonia (COP) from secondary causes including drug-induced lung injury, connective tissue disease, infection and the organising phase of diffuse alveolar damage.

Prof. Andrew Nicholson · Royal Brompton Hospital, London
PulmonaryILDTrainee

Most Discussed Cases

The following cases have generated the most active discussion among our community of pathologists, trainees and allied health professionals over the past 90 days.

#187 Comments

The benign-malignant borderline in Spitzoid lesions remains one of the most debated areas in dermatopathology. Community discussion has centred on the prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node positivity in paediatric Spitzoid tumours and whether the term STUMP should be abandoned in favour of more definitive molecular classification.

DermatopathologyExpert512 Views
#272 Comments

Active debate regarding the standardisation of the molecular autopsy in sudden cardiac death cases, the role of whole exome sequencing versus targeted cardiomyopathy gene panels, and the ethical and practical considerations of cascade genetic screening.

ForensicIntermediate634 Views
#364 Comments

Community contributors discussed the practical implementation of liquid biopsy in routine molecular pathology workflows, including pre-analytical variables affecting cell-free DNA yield, the limit of detection for resistance mutations and the concordance between tissue and plasma genotyping.

MolecularExpert521 Views
#458 Comments

Discussion focused on the distinction between classical hairy cell leukaemia and HCL-variant, which is now classified separately in the WHO 5th edition and the ICC. The consensus-based approach to treatment of HCL-v, including the role of BRAF inhibitors in classical HCL versus the lack of BRAF mutations in HCL-v, generated considerable engagement.

HaematopathologyExpert456 Views
#551 Comments

The unexpected discovery of an NTRK3 fusion in a triple-negative breast carcinoma sparked extensive discussion about the expanding indications for comprehensive genomic profiling beyond standard predictive biomarker testing.

BreastExpert342 Views

Educational Value & CPD Credits

Our clinical cases are designed as structured educational resources for pathologists at every career stage. Each case is aligned with established CPD and CME frameworks to support lifelong learning and professional accreditation.

847
Published Cases
2.5
CPD Credits Per Case
38
Countries Represented
124
Contributing Authors
For Trainees

Exam Preparation & Core Competencies

Our trainee-level cases are mapped to the FRCPath, ABPath and RCPA curricula, covering the core diagnostic patterns and systematic approaches expected at board level. Each case includes structured learning objectives, a stepwise diagnostic algorithm and self-assessment questions with referenced model answers.

  • FRCPath Part 2 mapped learning objectives
  • ABPath board-style self-assessment questions
  • Structured diagnostic approach templates
  • Progress tracking and completion certificates
For Practising Pathologists

CPD & CME Accreditation

Each clinical case published by Global Pathology Publications is accredited for continuing professional development by the Royal College of Pathologists (UK) and recognised by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits. Pathologists may claim up to 2.5 CPD credits per completed case.

  • RCPath CPD approved (up to 2.5 credits/case)
  • ACCME / AMA PRA Category 1 recognised
  • RCPA-approved for CPD points (Australia/NZ)
  • Automated CPD certificate generation
For Institutions

Departmental Teaching & Quality

Clinical cases from our library are widely used by pathology departments for multidisciplinary team meetings, slide seminars, journal clubs and quality assurance exercises. Institutional subscribers receive access to our full case archive including downloadable presentation-ready slide sets and structured discussion guides.

  • Downloadable slide sets for teaching sessions
  • Structured facilitator guides for journal clubs
  • Pre/post-test assessment instruments
  • Annual competency assessment portfolios

Submit a Case

We welcome clinical case submissions from pathologists, trainees and researchers worldwide. Every submission undergoes rigorous peer review by subspecialty experts before publication.

Prepare Your Case

Compile the clinical history, gross and microscopic descriptions, IHC/molecular results, differential diagnosis, final diagnosis and discussion. Ensure all patient information is fully anonymised. Obtain documented patient consent or institutional ethics approval for publication.

Upload Images & Data

Submit high-resolution histology images (minimum 300 dpi, TIFF or PNG format) with appropriate labelling. Include all relevant special stain and IHC images. Whole slide images in SVS, NDPI or MRXS format are encouraged and will be hosted on our digital pathology viewer.

Peer Review

Each submission is reviewed by a minimum of two subspecialty-qualified pathologists from our international editorial board. Reviewers assess diagnostic accuracy, educational value, image quality and manuscript clarity. The average review turnaround is 3–4 weeks.

Publication & Credit

Accepted cases are published with full author attribution, institutional affiliation and DOI assignment. Authors receive a certificate of publication and CPD credit for the educational contribution. Published cases are indexed in Google Scholar.

Submission Guidelines

All case submissions must follow the structured format below. The total manuscript length should not exceed 3,000 words excluding references.

  • Title: Concise and descriptive, including the key diagnostic entity. Maximum 150 characters.
  • Authors: Full names, qualifications, institutional affiliations and ORCID identifiers for all authors.
  • Clinical History: Anonymised patient demographics, presenting symptoms, relevant past medical history, examination findings and investigation results.
  • Gross Description: Specimen type, dimensions, macroscopic features and sampling strategy.
  • Microscopic Findings: Systematic description of histological features on H&E and special stains.
  • IHC / Molecular Results: Tabulated panel results with clones, dilutions and interpretation.
  • Differential Diagnosis: Structured discussion of at least three differential diagnostic considerations.
  • Final Diagnosis: Complete pathological diagnosis following WHO classification terminology.
  • Discussion: Educational discussion of the entity, its clinical significance and diagnostic pitfalls. Maximum 1,500 words.
  • Teaching Points: Three to five key take-home messages for the reader.
  • References: Vancouver style, minimum 5 and maximum 20 references.

All images must be original, unpublished and of diagnostic quality.

  • Minimum resolution: 300 dpi at reproduction size
  • File formats: TIFF (preferred), PNG or high-quality JPEG (minimum quality 95%)
  • Each image must include a labelled scale bar or magnification indicator
  • Patient-identifying information must be completely removed from all images
  • Whole slide images (WSI) should be submitted in SVS, NDPI or MRXS format
  • Minimum 4 and maximum 20 images per case
  • Each image must have a descriptive figure legend
  • Written informed consent for publication must be obtained from the patient or their legal representative
  • A signed consent form (template available on our website) must accompany every submission
  • All clinical information must be anonymised in accordance with HIPAA (US), GDPR (EU) and equivalent national regulations
  • Patient age should be given as a whole number; exact dates must not be included
  • Autopsy cases require consent from the legal next-of-kin or a waiver from the institutional ethics committee
  • Initial editorial screening (1–3 days): Completeness, image quality, ethical compliance and suitability
  • Subspecialty peer review (2–4 weeks): Minimum two subspecialty-qualified reviewers assess diagnostic accuracy, educational value and clarity
  • Author revision (2 weeks): Detailed reviewer feedback with two weeks for revision
  • Final editorial decision (3–5 days): Accept/reject decision by section editor
  • Production and publication (1–2 weeks): Copy-editing, image optimisation, DOI assignment and online publication

Overall average time from submission to publication: 6–8 weeks. Expedited review is available for cases of exceptional timeliness.

Submit a Case Now Download Author Guidelines (PDF)

Join 14,000+ Pathologists Learning from Clinical Cases

Our clinical case library is the largest peer-reviewed, openly accessible collection of pathology teaching cases available online. New cases are published weekly, each accompanied by expert commentary and accredited for CPD/CME credit. Register for free to access the full archive, participate in case discussions and track your learning progress.

Create Free Account Browse All Cases
All clinical cases are published with documented patient consent or institutional ethics approval. Clinical information is anonymised in accordance with HIPAA and GDPR requirements. Images are de-identified and published under Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 licence unless otherwise stated. The content on this page is intended for healthcare professionals and researchers. Diagnostic conclusions within individual cases should not be extrapolated as universal recommendations and should always be interpreted within the clinical context of the individual patient.